Legal Opinion

Wasserstrom v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 7, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about September 17, 1998, which, upon the grant *37of plaintiffs’ motion to reargue, adhered to the court’s prior order, inter alia, granting defendants’ motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing the complaint was proper since there was no evidence that plaintiff’s fall was attributable to negligence on the part of defendants. The circumstance that the floor upon which plaintiff slipped was “inherently…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Murphy v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Mroz v. Ella Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Duffy v. Universal Maintenance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Kimco Centereach 605, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Contreras v. Zabar'sAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Silverman v. HeronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API