Commonwealth v. Freelove
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This is an indictment for adultery, to which a motion to quash was filed, on the ground that it does not conclude against the peace of the Commonwealth nor against the statute in such cases made and provided. This motion was overruled, and the defendant alleged exceptions. The Pub. Sts. c. 213, § 16, expressly enact that no indictment shall be quashed on this ground, if the omission does not tend to prejudice the defendant. But it was argued that the statute is unconstitutional. We shall not consider how far the Legislature might go in simplifying indictments before encountering Article XII.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McLaughlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- White v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Commonwealth v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Hewitt v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1860
- Commonwealth v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. BogdanoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Commonwealth v. GedziumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Commonwealth v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.