Legal Opinion

Kountz v. Rowlands

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided November 11, 1942No. 243Published

1Opinion of the Court

Richardson, J.,

— This matter comes before us on exceptions filed by defendant to *462the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and decree nisi of the chancellor who enjoined defendant from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. Forty-one exceptions were filed, but many of these were abandoned at the argument and not covered in defendant’s brief. The remaining exceptions may be grouped into two main divisions, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings that the defendant was engaging in the practice of law without authority, and the form of the decree nisi.

Defendant entered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shortz v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Hosack v. Taylor Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API