Legal Opinion

HARLEY v. City of Spartanburg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 28, 1957No. 17250PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

This case involves the validity of certain proceedings wherein it was sought to annex to the City of Spartanburg an adjacent area known as Duncan Park.

Pursuant to the procedure prescribed in Title 47, Chapter I, Article 2 of the 1952 Code, relating to the extension of the corporate limits of cities and towns, a petition was filed by certain freeholders in the area proposed to be annexed, the boundaries of which were adequately described, asking that said territory be annexed to the City of Spartanburg. The petition was considered at a meeting of the City Council held on April…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gill v. . CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Epps v. McCallum Realty CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. People Ex Rel. Ottman v. HyndsNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  4. Good v. JarrardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  5. Gill v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. LA FRANCE IND., a DIV. OF RIEGEL TEX.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Hallums v. Michelin Tire Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Roof v. KimbroughCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API