Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Lanphier

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1917No. 13498PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Easterday, J., entered December 2, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for damages, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Parker, J. —

The plaintiffs seek recovery of damages alleged to have resulted to them from the negligent operation of an automobile belonging to the defendant J. B. Lanphier by his servant; and also seek recovery upon the bond executed by the defendants Lanphier, as principal, and Pacific Coast *355Casualty Company, as surety, which bond was filed in the office of the secretary of state in the securing by Lanphier of a permit to operate his automobile for hire in the city of Tacoma. Trial in the superior court without a jury resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs against both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tsutakawa v. KumamotoWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. In re WebbNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Laidlaw v. Portland, Vancouver & Yakima Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bogdan v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. McDonald v. LawrenceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Rogers v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. City of Providence v. LaurenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1922
  5. North West Cab Co. ex rel. Chamberlain v. Central Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API