Legal Opinion

Cowden v. Texas Development Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 12, 1937No. 8193PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellants brought this suit to cancel a mineral lease covering a large tract of land in block X, Crane county, Tex., alleging failure on the part of defendants to use due diligence to explore and develop the land for oil and other minerals. The bill prayed for cancellation of the lease and, in the alternative, for specific performance and for general relief. The answer denied that defendants were in default in developing the lease. A decree was rendered dismissing the bill. This appeal followed.

There is no dispute as to the law and very little as to the concrete facts.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sauder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Cosden Oil Co. v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  3. Armstrong v. Skelly Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. R. B. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Romero. Romero v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. Ivy Ellis Mize and Wife, Voncile Mize v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Haynes v. Southwest Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. Dillon v. HolcombDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API