Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The Defendants in this patent infringement case, Powerscreen International Distribution Limited (“Powerscreen”), Terex Corporation (“Terex”), Powerscreen New York, Inc. (“PSNY”), and Emerald Equipment Systems, Inc. (“Emerald”), have filed several post-trial motions. The Court now addresses four of these motions: (1) a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law; (2) a motion for a new trial; (3) a motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence; and (4) a motion for judgment as a matter of law, or, alternatively, for a…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Millea v. Metro-North RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thomas v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013