Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Greenfield v. Medco Health Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 22, 2016No. CIVIL NO. 12-522(NLH)(AMD)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, District Judge
This qui tarn action concerns claims by plaintiff, Steve Greenfield, that defendants violated the federal False Claims Act (“FCA”) relating to pharmaceutical products for hemophilia.1 Currently before *224the Court are the parties’ competing motions for summary judgment in their favor.2 For the reasons expressed below, defendants’ motion will be granted, and plaintiffs motion will be denied.
BACKGROUND
The allegations advanced by plaintiff against defendants, Medco Health Solutions, Inc.,3 Accredo Health Group, Inc. (“Accredo”), and Hemophilia Health Services, Inc.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Kreindler & Kreindler, Cross-Appellee v. United Technologies Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Thomas Foglia v. Renal Ventures ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Wilkins v. United Health Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Greenfield v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States ex rel. Simpson v. Bayer Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- United States v. MEDCOM CAROLINAS INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021