Legal Opinion
Howard v. Iron & Land Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 30, 1895No. Nos. 9457-(75)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Moer, J., sustaining separate demurrers of certain defendants to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This action was brought to foreclose an alleged equitable mortgage on real estate, executed by the defendant the Iron & Land Company. The other defendants were made parties *299as junior incumbrancers. The equitable mortgage is claimed to have been created by the execution of certain “mortgage debenture bonds,” each of the tenor following:
“Debenture.
“(1) The Iron & Land Company of Minnesota, Limited, herein.after called 'The Company,’ will, on the first day of May, 1899, pay to the bearer on presentation of this debenture the sum of £50. (2) The company will in the meantime and thereafter until…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Payne v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Wilson v. BoyceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Frost v. . KoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- White Water Valley Canal Company v. ValletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Daggett v. RankinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Earle v. Sunnyside Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Higgins v. MansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Assignment of Snyder v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Pearson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.