Legal Opinion · Concurrence

in the Interest of E.A. and D.A., Children

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2009No. 08-0157Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Brister

I concur in the Court’s judgment setting aside the default judgment against Norma Avitia. But I dissent to the Court’s abrogation of one of the oldest procedural rules in Texas.

For 150 years, the rule has been that a default judgment cannot be based on an amended petition seeking more onerous relief unless the amendment was served with citation. As we said in Weaver v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., “new citation is necessary for a party who has not appeared when the plaintiff, by amended petition, seeks a more onerous judgment than prayed for in the oi'iginal pleading.” 1 This Court, for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Drewery Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Richard M. Ross v. National Center for the Employment of the Disabled, as Successor in Interest to Access Healthsource, Inc., Assignee of O.R. BrookerTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Weaver v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Baker v. Monsanto Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Harrell v. Mexico Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API