World Insurance Co. v. Peavy
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
While it was alleged in the petition that the persons making the allegedly slanderous statements were “duly authorized agents” of the defendant company and that they were “prosecuting and transacting the business of the [company] pursuant to its express direction and authorization and acting within the scope of authority vested in them by the [company] as its direct and authorized agents concerning the subject matter of the slander,” it was not alleged that the agents were authorized or directed to speak the very words used in committing the alleged slander.
“A corporation is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Behre v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Southern Grocery Stores Inc. v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Ozborn v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Cochran v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Garren v. Southland Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Jordan v. JC PENNEY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Molton v. Commercial Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- White v. Cudahy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Fuqua Television, Inc. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.