Legal Opinion
Jordan v. JC PENNEY COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 7, 1966No. 42105PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Judge.
1. The original order sustaining the general demurrers with leave to amend unappealed from did not become the law of the case, since after plaintiff’s amendments the defendant renewed its demurrers to the “petition as amended” and moved to strike each count of the “petition as amended.” Under the ruling in Folsom v. Howell, 94 Ga. 112 (1) (21 SE 136) and the recent case of Perkins v. First Nat. Bank of Atlanta, 221 Ga. 82 (7) (143 SE2d 474), this opened the sufficiency of the petition to a fresh adjudication. Since the demurrers to the petition as amended were sustained, we look…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cabaniss v. HipsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Behre v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. ZerbstSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Davis v. General Finance & Thrift Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Folsom v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tuggle v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- City Stores Company v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Novack v. CITIES SERVICE OIL COMPANYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Santiago Vassallo v. Sears, Roebuck de Puerto Rico, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1974
- Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.