Bruce v. Foley
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.—Hon. J. A. Williamson, Judge. •
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gordon, J.
The brief of respondent contains a motion to strike the statement of facts because notice of settling the same was not given. It appears from the record and is conceded by the parties that the statement was regularly filed and served, and that no amendments were proposed or filed within the time limited by law. Under such circumstances we have held that notice of the settlement of the statement is not required. State, ex rel. Hersner, v. Arthur, 7 Wash. 358 (35 Pac. 120); Maney v. Hart, 11 Wash. 67 (39 Pac. 268).
Another ground upon which the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Griffin v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- New-York Central Ins. Co. v. . National Protection Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1856
- People v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Tompson v. Huron Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
- State ex rel. Hersner v. ArthurWashington Supreme Court · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Morgan v. Bankers Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Loeper v. LoeperWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Northern Life Insurance v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Bank of California v. Clear Lake Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
- Black v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.