Kinkead v. Peet
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal /rom Linn District Courts — Hon. Milo P. Smith, Judge. The opinion states the nature of the action and the material facts.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
At the outset of the transactions from which this controversy has arisen, the plaintiff, Charles H. Kinkead, was the owner of two hundred and seventy-six acres of land in Linn County,'and a house and lot in the town of Springville. A mortgage upon said land was made by Kinkead and wife to Helmer & Gortner to secure the payment of a note for $13,000, bearing date June 19, 1902, of which note and mortgage the defendant, Peet, thereafter became owner by assignment. Soon thereafter a second mortgage on the same property was made by Kinkead and wife to James K. Hakes to secure an indebtedness of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mahoney v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Gresham v. WareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Benham v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- Montgomery v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- Malone v. RoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Campbell v. OHIO NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Caro v. WollenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Sedlak v. DudaNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Yellowstone Sheep Co. v. EllisWyoming Supreme Court · 1939