Legal Opinion
Oregon Iron & Steel Co. v. Kelso State Bank
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1924No. 18457PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
This action is here without any statement of facts and the only question is whether the findings of fact justify the conclusions of law and the judgment. The findings, conclusions and judgment are as follows:
I
“That the Oregon Iron & Steel Company, Ladd & Tilton Bank, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, United States National Bank of Portland, and the Kelso State Bank of Kelso, Washington, are all corporations duly organized and existing.
II
“That John P. Duke is the duly qualified and acting supervisor of banking of the state of Washington; that on the 17th day of March, 1921, the said Kelso…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Oddie v. . the Nat. City Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Nineteenth Ward Bank v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- First National Bank v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
- Lincoln County v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Town of Randolph v. City of BarreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
- Haynes Equity Union Exchange v. First National Bank of HettingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.