Davis v. Winona Wagon Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles W. Slack, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinon of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
The plaintiff, as' assignee in insolvency of the Bull & Grant Farm Implement Company, a corporation, has brought this action against defendant, a corporation, to recover fourteen thousand dollars damages, alleged to be the value of certain wagons and other vehicles wrongfully converted by defendant to its own use. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and order denying Ms motion for a new trial.
The merits of this litigation are to be disposed of upon a consideration of the second cause of action. The material facts, as found by the trial court, may be substantially stated as follows: The Bull &…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy v. MulgrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Parrott v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Brown v. Bank of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Byxbee v. DeweyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Weintraub v. WeingartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Wright v. SalzbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bisconer v. BillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. Dunning Floor Covering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Malaquias v. NovoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.