Legal Opinion
Panek v. Panek
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 27, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in directing defendant to pay child support retroactive to June 1991. The Domestic Relations Law provides that a direction for the payment of child support shall "be effective as of the date of the application therefor” (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [7] [a]; § 240 [1]; see, Burns v Burns, 84 NY2d 369, 377; Berge v Berge, 159 AD2d 960, 961; see also, Family Ct Act § 449 [2]). Plaintiff’s application for child support was made on October 25, 1994, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Burns v. BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Levine v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Berge v. BergeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Silberman v. SilbermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Corasanti v. CorasantiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Reed v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Kay v. CameronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Wheeler v. WheelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Blake v. BlakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011