Legal Opinion · Dissent
Consolidated Gas Company of Florida, Inc. v. City Gas Company of Florida, a Florida Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 19, 1990No. 87-6108Published
1DissentTjoflat, Chief Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
At first blush, this ease appears to involve a straightforward application of section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2 (1988). A natural gas utility,. City Gas Company (City Gas), with an apparent mo*1267nopoly in the natural gas business in south Florida, refused to sell wholesale natural gas to another company, Consolidated Gas Company (Consolidated), that wanted to enter the natural gas business too. Consolidated brought suit under sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15(a), 26 (1988),1 claiming that City Gas refused to deal in violation of section 2 and thus…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.