Legal Opinion
Dakis on Behalf of Dakis Pension Plan v. Chapman
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 14, 1983No. C82-6814 SWPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Upon consideration of oral argument entertained on August 19, 1983, and briefs submitted in support and opposition to defendants’ Davis Skaggs & Co., Inc., Morgan Stanley and Philip Chapman motion to dismiss Count 2 of plaintiff’s first amended complaint, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED, with leave for plaintiff to amend her complaint in the manner described below. A brief discussion of the questions presented by defendants’ motion follows.
FACTS:
The essential facts surrounding the instant complaint…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike GrancichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Schacht v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Schaick v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of Boston, Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Brubaker v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Rush v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.