Legal Opinion

In Re the Discipline of Arendt

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] The Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of South Dakota filed a formal accusation against attorney A1 Arendt pursuant to SDCL 16-19-67. The Board recommended that Arendt be suspended from the practice of law-in the courts of South Dakota for a period of 120 days. Arendt admitted the allegations of the formal accusation and agreed to the sanction pursuant to SDCL 16-19-68. We conclude that suspension from the practice of law for a period of 120 days is an appropriate sanction.

[¶ 2.] Arendt graduated from law school in 1978. Upon his admission to the bar, he practiced law in Timber Lake…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of EicherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re the Discipline of MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of OrtnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re Discipline of JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re the Matter of Discipline of ReynoldsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Discipline of SwierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. In Re the Discipline of TornowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API