Legal Opinion
United States v. Hunter
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 24, 1994No. 2:92-cr-80769PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In these consolidated cases, the United States has charged Daniel Hunter, D. Bruce Clark, Kent Lomont, John Stemple, Robert Lanches, and George Dodson with conspiracy to violate federal statutes regulating the manufacture, transfer, and possession of machineguns. Defendants are gun manufacturers and dealers from Michigan, Ohio and Indiana. They have raised a number of pretrial motions on which the Court heard oral argument on September 22, 1993. After careful review of the issues raised, the Court is now prepared to rule on these motions.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Raymond Rybar, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. John W. KenneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Samuel ChoiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Steven Scott KnutsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Larry Francis WilksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.