Legal Opinion

Davis

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 27, 1978No. 334-77PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"This is an inverse condemnation case in which the plaintiffs (administrators and trustees) claim that the estates and persons they represent (which we shall call the Foller and Rohleder interests) were in fact the only owners of a piece of property (in the District of Columbia) condemned by the Federal Government, but through the Government’s wrong failed to receive the full award made by the District Court for the District of Columbia; instead, half of the award was given and paid, allegedly wrongfully, to two other claimants. Plaintiffs say that these claimants (charities) were not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941
  2. Phillips v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  3. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. 22,680 Acres of Land in Kleberg County, Texas: Virginia Jones Mullin v. Nicolas Balli, Intervenors-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. 758.72 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  2. Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API