Legal Opinion

South End Improvement Group, Inc. ex rel. Bank of New York v. Mulliken

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 15, 1992No. 90-3431PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal and cross appeal arising out of a minority stockholder’s derivative action. The Bank of New York, as Trustee under the Will of C.J. Devine, appeals from a final judgment determining that it lacked standing to bring a derivative suit on behalf of South End Improvement Group, Inc. against appellees, the directors of South End. The directors cross appeal the trial court’s findings against them on the merits of the bank’s action. We reverse on the standing issue but reject the claims on cross appeal.

FACTS

The bank, as trustee under the will of C.J. Devine, owns 204 (22%) of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Binger v. King Pest ControlSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Gimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
  3. Gallup v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. Gimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  5. Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Provence v. Palm Beach Taverns, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Aurora Credit Services, Inc. v. Liberty West Development, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Boettcher v. IMC Mortg. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Timko v. TriarsiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, L.L.P. v. HollfelderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API