Legal Opinion

In re Thorpe

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 2019No. Bky. No. 13-15267 ELFPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ERIC L. FRANK, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

Bankruptcy courts are not courts of general jurisdiction able to resolve every dispute that may affect a bankruptcy debtor during the pendency of a bankruptcy case. A fundamental principle of federal jurisprudence is that federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. Bankruptcy court jurisdiction constitutes a strictly circumscribed subset of that limited federal court jurisdiction. Further, even when bankruptcy jurisdiction attaches, it tends to "wane" after the confirmation of a bankruptcy plan. See Nuveen Mun. Trust ex rel. Nuveen…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Nuveen Municipal Trust Ex Rel. Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund v. WithumSmith Brown, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Constitution Bank v. TubbsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. In Re Clinton Centrifuge, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. United States v. Kevin WeatherspoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API