Legal Opinion

Twiggar v. Rosenberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtPlatt, J.

This is a motion to restrain the defendant from conducting a moving picture show pending this action, in one of the thickly settled sections of the village of Ossining and in close proximity to several large churches.

The Appellate Division in this department held in People v. Hemleb, 127 App. Div. 356, that the only law applicable is section 265 of the Penal Code and that that section does not apply to moving pictures but only to similar shows to those it enumerates.

Moving picture shows were not known at the time this section was enacted. The penalty prescribed for its violation ■ was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HemlebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Village of New Rochelle v. LangNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People ex rel. Bender v. JoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Hamlin v. BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. EbbetsNew York Court of Special Session · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API