Mount Vernon Co. v. Mount Vernon Metal Products Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order denying motion to cancel lis pendens reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, and notice *754of pendency of action canceled. The action as disclosed by the complaint being one to recover upon a personal obligation, and having no relation to the real estate described, the filing of the notice was improper, the same not being within the purview of section 120 of the Civil Practice Act. (See Brox v. Riker, 56 App. Div. 388; St. Regis Paper Co. v. Santa Clara Co., 62 id. 538; Kings-Bright Const. Co. v. Loizeaux…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brox v. RikerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Corporate Investing Co. v. Mount Vernon Metal Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Seawane Greens, Inc. v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1958