Birdwell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUENTIN KEITH, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of driving while intoxicated and the jury assessed his punishment at a fine of $100 and confinement in jail for seven days.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged and appellant’s single ground of error complains of the trial court’s action in permitting a police officer to testify as to the results of a breathalyzer test without a proper predicate having been laid.
The circumstances surrounding the alleged error are these: Before the trial be gan, State’s counsel advised the court and appellant’s counsel that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Roman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- French v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Kalmbach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Scruggs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Ashford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Sutton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.