Legal Opinion

Birdwell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 12, 1974No. 48413PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

QUENTIN KEITH, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of driving while intoxicated and the jury assessed his punishment at a fine of $100 and confinement in jail for seven days.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged and appellant’s single ground of error complains of the trial court’s action in permitting a police officer to testify as to the results of a breathalyzer test without a proper predicate having been laid.

The circumstances surrounding the alleged error are these: Before the trial be gan, State’s counsel advised the court and appellant’s counsel that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Roman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. French v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Kalmbach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Scruggs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Ashford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Sutton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API