Kalmbach v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for robbery. Trial was before a jury, which assessed punishment at confinement for 30 years. Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence.
In his brief, appellant raises three grounds of error. In his first ground of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of a police officer concerning statements made to him by appellant’s co-indictee, Floyd Culver. The record reflects that Detective Elmer Boyd of the Dallas Police Department testified on direct examination that he was one of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Swanson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Spaulding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.