Legal Opinion

Norman v. Roseman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court.—Hon. Leroy B. Valliant, Judge. There was no double agency on plaintiff’s part. Robinson v. Jarvis, 25 Mo. App. 421; Reese v. Gerth, 36 Mo. App. 641; Dunlap v. Smith, 2 E. D. Smith, 181.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

Plaintiff is a real estate agent. He instituted this action before a justice of the peace to recover from the defendant $200, which he alleged the defendant agreed to pay him as commission on a real estate transaction. The defendant is the owner of some property on Cleveland avenue, and Charles H. Sawyer and others were the owners of a business house on Franklin avenue. The plaintiff claims that the defendant employed him to effect an exchange of the properties on certain terms; that he' induced Sawyer to agree to the exchange on the terms proposed; that Sawyer offered to consummate the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. CurrieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McClure v. UllmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Dennison v. GaultMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Owen v. MatthewsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API