Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Currie

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1892PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

The plaintiffs are real-estate agents, and they sne defendant for value of their services in bringing about the exchange of a farm formerly owned by the defendant for some real estate belonging to New-berry and Valentine. The action was commenced on the twenty-eighth day of November, 1891. The petition declares on a special contract of employment, and an agreement by the defendant to pay to plaintiffs two and one-half-per-cent, commission on the value of his property, provided a sale or trade was effected by them. The petition also contains the averment, that the above commission or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rice v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Atlee v. FinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Sprague v. RooneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. DeSteiger v. HollingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Robinson v. JarvisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Glenn v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Connor v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Mees v. GrewerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Plotner v. Chillson & ChillsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Stewart v. Van HorneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API