Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Price

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 14, 1933No. 20684Published

1Opinion of the Court

OSBORN. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Seminole coun- 1y .sustaining a general demurrer to plaintiffs amended petition and dismissing said cause.

Plaintiffs alleged that tlie lands in controversy were allotted to Nannie ' l)unn, a full-bloód Creek Indian, who died in Seminole county on or about the 1st day of March, 1915, leaving the plaintiffs' afid then-brother, Harry Dunn, as her sole heirs, and that .each of .them took an undivided one-third interest in said lands; that in 191S the-respective guardians for-each of plaintiffs filed petitions in the county court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abraham v. HomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Hathaway v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Eaves v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Wolf v. GillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Tiger v. DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API