Legal Opinion

Porter v. United States

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 21, 1985No. Civ. A. C-1-82-1298PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVID S. PORTER, Senior District Judge:

This wrongful death case arises under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. (1981). The United States has moved, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), Fed. R.Civ.P., to dismiss the claims against it based upon the Court’s asserted lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (doc. 24); plaintiffs responded (doc. 26), and the government replied (doc. 28). We heard argument on the motion on May 2, 1985. Although, as developed below, we seriously question our jurisdiction based on procedural deficiencies with regard to the timing of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Daniel J. Monaco and Denise E. Monaco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keith L. Prescott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Keith L. Prescott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Abernathy v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API