Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1969No. 18PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

In his brief, the defendant discusses ten exceptive assignments, eight of which involve objections to the solicitor’s cross examination of the defendant, who testified as a witness in his own defense. The cross examination covered nine pages of the record. Under the solicitor’s questions, the defendant admitted he had been convicted on a charge of assault on a female with a deadly weapon. He testified he was placed on probation and ordered to pay damages. He contended the shooting was an accident. He was convicted of larceny when he was a minor. He admitted he had been indicted for rape but…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842
  4. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. State v. SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Reed v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API