Legal Opinion

Leininger v. Pierce County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The plaintiffs seek, under sec. 88.38, Stats., to recover from Pierce county damages which they sustained by the flooding of their land by surface waters, which accumulated because a culvert under the grade of a federal-state highway was inadequate to afford sufficient drainage. In Leininger v. County Highway Committee, 217 Wis. 61, 258 N. W. 368, we held that the damages could not be recovered in condemnation proceedings. In the present action the court concluded, upon findings which the plaintiffs do not question, that they cannot recover from Pierce county under sec. 88.38, Stats. That…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crowley v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Larsen v. Kewaunee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Leininger v. County Highway CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. Chippewa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lloyd v. Chippewa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API