Legal Opinion
Bigsby v. Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided March 28, 2018No. 14–cv–1398 (JGK)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
Lamar Bigsby, Jr., and Karla Freeland first filed this putative class action against *712Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc., in its capacity as successor to a mortgage-servicing company known as HomEq Servicing Corp., over four years ago. Dkt. No. 2; see Dkt. No. 22. Bigsby and Freeland alleged that Barclays and HomEq defrauded mortgagors in the assessment of foreclosure-related fees, giving rise to claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO") and related common law claims. Barclays previously filed a motion to dismiss the complaint…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bigsby v. Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Acklin v. EichnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Acklin v. EichnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Capital 7 Funding v. Wingfield Capital CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Della Mura v. ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.