AT & T Corp. v. Sprint Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MCLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
Joel Drizin appeals from the denial of his motion to intervene in this case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Cote, J.). He seeks to intervene in order to request a modification to the district court’s protective order. Because the district court did not abuse its considerable discretion in denying intervention, we affirm.
*561BACKGROUND
This litigation involves an alleged scheme by Sprint Corporation and co-defendants (collectively, “Sprint”) whereby callers who misdialed while attempting to make a collect call through AT & T, Inc.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. Sequa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
3Cited by74 opinions
- Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Police & Fire Retirement System v. IndyMac MBS, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Dorsett v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.