Legal Opinion

Littlefield v. South Carolina Forestry Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 20, 1999No. 25036PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice:

At issue in this appeal is the manner in which state agencies calculate pay for unused annual leave of terminated, deceased, and retiring state employees. The methodology employed by state agencies differs depending upon whether the state employee is terminated, retires, or dies. The circuit court upheld the agencies’ methodology, finding no equal protection violation in the disparate treatment accorded different employees. The court also denied employees’ motion for class certification. We reverse.

FACTS

Employees in this case are Catherine Littlefield and Vivian Martin, former…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. County of HorrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. McGann v. MungoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Redmond v. Lexington County School District No. FourSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. South Carolina Public Service Authority v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. University of South Carolina v. MehlmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Salmonsen v. CGD, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Grazia v. South Carolina State Plastering, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Melton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
  4. Brooks v. GAF Materials Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
  5. Calvin Henson v. SCDCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API