Legal Opinion
Stuart Carpenter v. Maurice Sigler
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1970No. 19668_1PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Chief Judge.
Stuart Carpenter has taken a timely appeal from the denial by the District Court (Judge Van Pelt) of his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. Carpenter was convicted by the state court of burglary in violation of § 28-532 R. S. Nebraska and possession of burglary tools in violation of § 28-534 R. S. Nebraska. Concurrent sentences of three-years imprisonment were imposed. The conviction was affirmed, State v. Carpenter, 181 Neb. 639, 150 N.W.2d 129.
Carpenter contends that certain burglary tools were improperly received in evidence at his trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- United States v. Rickus, Robert F. United States of America v. Nazarok, Dennis M. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Alfred Earl HarflingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- United States v. George Willie Nicholas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Cloyd L. UnverzagtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.