Legal Opinion
Advanced Seal Technology, Inc. v. Perry
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 10, 1995No. 94 C 4128PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order
PLUNKETT, District Judge.
This court Adopts and Affirms Magistrate Judge Pallmeyer’s Report and Recommendation of October 26, 1994 and Denies Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary Injunction. This ease is hereby dismissed, all matters having been resolved. Dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff reinstating or refiling within 30 days to claim damages.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PALLMEYER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Advanced Seal Technology, Inc. (“AST”), a manufacturer based in Elgin, Illinois, alleges that the Defense Industrial Supply Center (“DISC”), under the control of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Amanda Beck, a Minor, by Her Father, Henry J. Beck v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keefe-Shea Joint Venture, Inc. v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Blue Dot Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Keefe-Shea Joint Venture, Inc. v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Ozinga Chicago Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.