Legal Opinion

State v. Nakashima

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1911No. 8913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered February 11, 1910, upon sustaining an objection to the introduction of evidence, dismissing a prosecution for incest.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This is an appeal by the state of Washington from a judgment sustaining an objection to the introduction of evidence, and dismissing a criminal action.

The controlling question is the sufficiency of the information, the charging portion of which reads as follows:

“He, the said Masaji Nakashima, a male person, and she, said Tama Kawamura, a female person, in the county of King, state of Washington, on the 20th day of November, 1909, being then and there first cousins computing by the rules of the civil law, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously have sexual intercourse together.”

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennegar v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  2. State v. FennWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. FrittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wright v. SuydamWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Leefield v. LeefieldOregon Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API