State v. McIntosh
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Si-iipp, J., Florence, Indictment against Harry McIntosh and John Williams. Defendants appeal. Statement of parties arrested with defendants are inadmissible: 36 S. C. 524; 49 S. C. 410; 89 S. C. 234; 12 Cyc. 423; 40 S. C. 481; 48 S. C. 136; 61 S. C. 292. Statements made in presence of defendants are competent: State v. Bdzvards, 13 S. C.; State v. Major, 70 S. C.; State v. Senn, 32 S. C.; State v. Suddiith, 74 S. C.; 79 S. C. 286.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Hydrick.
On March 6, 1912, • Andrew Jackson, a little boy, eight or ten j^ears old, of the city of Florence, disappeared. On the second day thereafter, his dead body was found in an empty box car, on the repair tracks of the railroad company. The circumstances indicated that he had been murdered. The shoe tracks of a man were found leading to and from the car. They showed certain peculiar characteristics by which it -vyas thought the shoe that made them might be identified.
A few days after the discovery of the body, four colored boys,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- State v. McDanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
- State v. . GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- State v. GilliamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- State of Arizona v. DuguidArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Powers v. RawlsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Griffith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Lee v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.