Legal Opinion

Fonnesbeck v. Eisinger

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 28, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00273Unknown

1Opinion

2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 TRAVIS D. FONNESBECK, Case No. 3:19-cv-00273-MMD-CLB 7 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 8 9 JAKE EISINGER, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 I. SUMMARY 13 Pro se Plaintiff Travis D. Fonnesbeck alleges that Defendants violated his Fourth 14 Amendment rights by using excessive force against him during an arrest. (ECF No. 1-1 15 (“Complaint”)); (see also ECF No. 5 at 8 (characterizing Plaintiff’s allegations as a claim 16 for excessive force).) Before the Court is Defendants Bradley Parvin and Shane Daz’s 17 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API