Legal Opinion
Andrews University v. Robert Bell Industries, Ltd.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 27, 1988No. K87-117PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Andrews University (“Andrews”) is a private non-profit institution located in Berrien Springs, Michigan. Defendant K.M.W., Inc. (KMW) is a foreign corporation with offices in Ontario, Canada and Atlanta, Georgia. Defendant Robert Bell Industries, Ltd. (“Bell”) is a manufacturer of boilers and related accessories. Bell’s principal — and apparently its sole— place of business is Seaforth, Ontario, Canada. Plaintiff invokes diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
In April 1984, KMW purchased a fire-box boiler (the “boiler”) from Bell “F.O.B.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brabeau v. SMB CORP.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
- Starbrite Distributing, Inc. v. EXCELDA MANUF. CO.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Im Ex Trading Co. v. RaadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- AM Diagnostics, Inc. v. DenneyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Starbrite Distributing, Inc. v. Excelda Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995