Legal Opinion
Enron Equipment Procurement Co. v. THE M/V TITAN 2
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided December 13, 1999No. 99-1111PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
TRIMBLE, District Judge.
Presently before the court is a motion to dismiss the complaint, to dissolve the arrest and attachment of the TITAN 2, and for damages for unlawful seizure [doc. 17]. This motion was filed by defendant State Production Enterprise Chernomorneftegaz pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, this court finds that the motion to dissolve the arrest and attachment of the TITAN 2 and for damages for unlawful seizure should be DENIED.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Since 1991, the Ukraine has been an…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ames v. Great Southern BankTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- NationsBank, N.A. v. DillingTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Atwood Turnkey Drilling, Inc. v. Petroleo Brasileiro, S.A. v. International Underwater ContractorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Rodriguez v. Transnave Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- S & S MacHinery Co. v. Masinexportimport, a Romanian Corporation, and the Romanian Bank for Foreign TradeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dale v. ColagiovanniDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2004