Legal Opinion

NationsBank, N.A. v. Dilling

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1996No. 95-0605PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Per curiam

We must determine whether a bank is vicariously liable for the fraudulent acts of a bank teller whose participation in an investment scheme caused damages to a third party. We also must decide whether the bank is directly liable to the third party for negligently employing the teller, who improperly issued cashier’s checks that the bank hon ored. We hold that vicarious liability does not attach to an employer in the absence of evidence that its employee was acting within the scope of her actual or apparent authority, and that a bank owes no duty to protect a third party from making investment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ames v. Great Southern BankTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Douglass v. Panama, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Biggs v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Southwest Title Insurance Co. v. Northland Building Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Waffle House, Inc. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. IRA Resources, Inc. v. GriegoTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Gaines v. KellyTexas Supreme Court · 2007

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API