Legal Opinion

Flaherty v. Collins

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 2, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

These are two actions of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained in the circumstances set forth below. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in each case. The defendants' exceptions are to the denial of their respective motions for directed verdicts and to certain instructions given to the jury by the judge.

The cases had been referred to an auditor who filed his report in which he found that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and that the defendants were not *154negligent, and found for the defendants. The findings of the auditor were not to be final.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Barnes v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Lemay v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Austin v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Kane v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Service Lines, Inc. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  2. Prime Business Co. v. DrinkwaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  3. Linhares v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  4. Welsh v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API