Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Industrial Commission of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1936No. 5631PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

We are asked to reopen this case for rehearing on the grounds the evidence is definite that the splinter came from work for Knowlton and Rupert on the bridge because Parkinson testified that when the decedent first came to his work he had his fingers bandaged up. But even though the evidence eliminates the Parkinson job as the source of the splinter, it still leaves the speculation as to whether it came from the Knowlton and Ruper job or some other place, because we cannot consider decedent’s statement that he got the splinter working on the bridge. Moreover, even though the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API