Legal Opinion
Church Homes, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 24, 1999No. SC 16073PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
Pursuant to General Statutes § 31-236 (a) (3),1 an employee is ineligible for unemployment benefits when unemployed because of a labor dispute, *300unless such unemployment is due to, inter aha, a lockout by the employer. In this appeal, we must determine: (1) whether the trial court properly concluded that a lockout existed and that, consequently, the employees were entitled to unemployment benefits pursuant to § 31-236 (a) (3) (C) (ii) where the employer had announced that the striking employees could return to work under the terms of an expired collective bargaining agreement…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Malone v. White Motor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nash v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Branhaven Plaza, LLC v. Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Kirby of Norwich v. Adm'r, Unemployment Comp. ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Addona v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.