Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Schmidt

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 3, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2020-1785Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOCELYN DIONNE CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:20-cv-1785 (CRC) WILLIAM S. SCHMIDT, in his official capacity as the Suspension and Debarment Official, Suspension & Debarment Division of the U.S. General Services Administration, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Jocelyn Campbell was debarred—that is, banned from contracting with the federal government—by the U.S. General Services Administration (“GSA”), and therefore lost her management job at a hospice that accepts federal reimbursement. Ms. Campbell sued GSA and two…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API