Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jacobson

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 22, 1985PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, C.J.

Following a lengthy jury trial in the Superior Court, the defendants, Barry J. Jacobson and Patrick Clarke, were convicted of burning a dwelling house (G. L. c. 266, § 1) and sentenced. 2 Represented by new counsel on appeal, the defendants argue that their respective motions for required findings of not guilty, Mass.R.Crim.P. 25(a), 378 Mass. 896 (1979), should have been allowed. We first take up the rule 25 motions filed at the conclusion of the Commonwealth’s case, concluding that Jacobson’s motion was properly denied but that Clarke’s motion should have been allowed. We thereafter…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. O'DELLMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. FancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FrazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. MezzanottiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. BurnsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API